Using explanatory case study design to promote rigorous, systematic investigation of community-university partnerships
Lina Dostilio, Director, Academic Community Engagement, Duquesne University [dostiliol@duq.edu]
Conference track: Contexts and methods: Theoretical and conceptual frameworks, research designs, and methodological issues
Format: Research/Scholarly paper
Summary
This paper addresses case study critique and promotes rigor by presenting explanatory case study method (ECS). ECS investigates phenomena through proposition building and explanation testing. Positive and negative evidence iteratively refine an explanatory proposition over multiple contexts.
Rubin (2000) noted that community engagement research concerned with partnerships utilized descriptive case study methods. Descriptive cases continue to be published but are often noted to be of limited use. Depicted as context specific and lacking methodological sophistication, they are portrayed as a weak means to investigate the scholarship and practice of service-learning and community engagement. This paper provides a rigorous and systematic alternative to the descriptive case study while retaining the significance of context and multiplicity of variables.
Case studies, generally, are not euphemistic for an historic description of an educational program. Rather, they are meant to be a method of research appropriate when the goal is to create broad rather than narrow definition(s) of phenomenon, to examine phenomenon in context rather than separately, and to use multiple rather than singular sources of evidence (Yin, 1994). ECS capitalizes on these conditions and relies on carefully crafted explanatory propositions (Yin, 1994) to generate a theory of how factors affect a phenomenon.
This paper illustrates the first iteration of applying ECS to democratically-engaged partnerships. ECS was used as a means to investigate the relationship between the acquisition of a democratic orientation and external partnership conditions, partnership learning interactions, and stakeholder competencies and attributes. The paper provides an example of the development of an ECS, including the explanatory proposition, how it is informed by extant theory (in this case, reciprocal determinism), the selection of research questions appropriate to the proposition, the mechanisms by which the proposition is tested and refined, and how preparations are made for the next iteration. Rather than resign ourselves to post-hoc descriptions and conjecture about the reasons these phenomena occurred, (ECS) allows us to honor the context and specificity of situational influence in a systematic and rigorous way.
References
Diezmann, C. M. (2002). Beyond description: Using case study to test and refine an instructional theory. Paper presented at the Contemporary Approaches to Research in Mathematics, Science, Health and Environment Conference, Burwood, Australia.
Emigh, R. J. (1997). The power of negative thinking: The use of negative case methodology in the development of sociological theory. Theory and Society, 26(5), 648-684. doi: 10.1023/A:1006896217647
Fisher, I., & Ziviani, J. (2004). Explanatory case studies: Implications and applications for clinical
research. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 51(4), 185-191. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2004.00446.x
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newberry Park, CA: SAGE.
Rubin, V. (2000). Evaluating university-community partnerships: An examination of the evolution of questions and approaches. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 5(1), 219 - 230.
Stevens, F. I. (1993). Applying an opportunity-to-learn conceptual framework to the investigation of the effects of teaching practices via secondary analyses of multiple case study summary data. The Journal of Negro Education, 62(3), 232-248. doi: 10.2307/2295463
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Vol. 5. Applied Social Research Methods Series. Thousand Oaks: CA: SAGE.
To access materials from this session please click on the file link(s) below:
Using explanatory case study design to promote rigorous, systematic investigation of community-university partnerships
Lina Dostilio, Director, Academic Community Engagement, Duquesne University [dostiliol@duq.edu]
Keywords: Explanatory case studies, democratic engagement, partnerships, explanation testing, reciprocal determinism
Conference track: Contexts and methods: Theoretical and conceptual frameworks, research designs, and methodological issues
Format: Research/Scholarly paper
Summary
This paper addresses case study critique and promotes rigor by presenting explanatory case study method (ECS). ECS investigates phenomena through proposition building and explanation testing. Positive and negative evidence iteratively refine an explanatory proposition over multiple contexts.
Rubin (2000) noted that community engagement research concerned with partnerships utilized descriptive case study methods. Descriptive cases continue to be published but are often noted to be of limited use. Depicted as context specific and lacking methodological sophistication, they are portrayed as a weak means to investigate the scholarship and practice of service-learning and community engagement. This paper provides a rigorous and systematic alternative to the descriptive case study while retaining the significance of context and multiplicity of variables.
Case studies, generally, are not euphemistic for an historic description of an educational program. Rather, they are meant to be a method of research appropriate when the goal is to create broad rather than narrow definition(s) of phenomenon, to examine phenomenon in context rather than separately, and to use multiple rather than singular sources of evidence (Yin, 1994). ECS capitalizes on these conditions and relies on carefully crafted explanatory propositions (Yin, 1994) to generate a theory of how factors affect a phenomenon.
This paper illustrates the first iteration of applying ECS to democratically-engaged partnerships. ECS was used as a means to investigate the relationship between the acquisition of a democratic orientation and external partnership conditions, partnership learning interactions, and stakeholder competencies and attributes. The paper provides an example of the development of an ECS, including the explanatory proposition, how it is informed by extant theory (in this case, reciprocal determinism), the selection of research questions appropriate to the proposition, the mechanisms by which the proposition is tested and refined, and how preparations are made for the next iteration. Rather than resign ourselves to post-hoc descriptions and conjecture about the reasons these phenomena occurred, (ECS) allows us to honor the context and specificity of situational influence in a systematic and rigorous way.
References
Diezmann, C. M. (2002). Beyond description: Using case study to test and refine an instructional theory. Paper presented at the Contemporary Approaches to Research in Mathematics, Science, Health and Environment Conference, Burwood, Australia.
Emigh, R. J. (1997). The power of negative thinking: The use of negative case methodology in the development of sociological theory. Theory and Society, 26(5), 648-684. doi: 10.1023/A:1006896217647
Fisher, I., & Ziviani, J. (2004). Explanatory case studies: Implications and applications for clinical
research. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 51(4), 185-191. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2004.00446.x
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newberry Park, CA: SAGE.
Rubin, V. (2000). Evaluating university-community partnerships: An examination of the evolution of questions and approaches. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 5(1), 219 - 230.
Stevens, F. I. (1993). Applying an opportunity-to-learn conceptual framework to the investigation of the effects of teaching practices via secondary analyses of multiple case study summary data. The Journal of Negro Education, 62(3), 232-248. doi: 10.2307/2295463
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Vol. 5. Applied Social Research Methods Series. Thousand Oaks: CA: SAGE.
To access materials from this session please click on the file link(s) below: